Categories
News Review

Москва ответит на любые враждебные шаги ЕС, включая ввод контингентов в Украину

Categories
News Review

@DakdaR22 No!!! It is a step too far for Russia. The Americans didn’t want nuclear weapons in Cuba, why should Russia want them in Ukraine?

The post @DakdaR22 No!!! It is a step too far for Russia. The Americans didn’t want nuclear weapons in Cuba, why should Russia want them in Ukraine? first appeared on The Russian World – russianworld.net.

Categories
News Review

Azerbaijan cracks down on citizens involved in illegal armed groups abroad

Azerbaijani authorities have carried out comprehensive investigative measures following reports that citizens of the Republic of Azerbaijan were involved in the creation of illegal armed groups and were being exploited by foreign intelligence services for reconnaissance, sabotage, and terrorist activities, Azernews reports, citing the Press Service of the State Security Service (SSS).

The post Azerbaijan cracks down on citizens involved in illegal armed groups abroad first appeared on The South Caucasus News – SouthCaucasusNews.com.

Categories
News Review

Australia Implements Under-16 Social Media Ban

Plus: Investors are pricing in an almost 90% chance that the Federal Reserve will lower interest rates later today. And Eileen Higgins becomes the first Democrat elected as Miami’s mayor in almost three decades. Luke Vargas hosts. Sign up for WSJ’s free What’s News newsletter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Categories
News Review

Federal Reserve poised to cut rates as Trump plots new course for bank

The Federal Reserve will make its final interest rate decision of 2025 on Wednesday, setting up a pivotal year for both the U.S. economy and the central bank as President Trump prepares to install …

The post Federal Reserve poised to cut rates as Trump plots new course for bank first appeared on FBI Reform – fbireform.com.

The post Federal Reserve poised to cut rates as Trump plots new course for bank first appeared on October Surprise 2024 – octobersurprise-2024.org.

Categories
News Review

Trump Economy, Federal Reserve December, Afghan Fighters’ Struggles

President Trump insists the economy is thriving. So, how does he explain why so many voters view the economy negatively? Also, the Federal Reserve considers whether to cut interest rates today. Will concerns over inflation keep rates as is or will unemployment worries prompt another cut? Plus, the unraveling of the Afghan man accused of gunning down two National Guard members. How are other Afghans in the US who fought for the CIA navigating the stress and despair that commonly haunt frontline soldiers? Want more analysis of the most important news of the day, plus a little fun? Subscribe to the Up First newsletter. Today’s episode of Up First was edited by Rebekah Metzler, Rafael Nam, Luis Clemens, Alice Woelfle, and Arezou Rezvani. It was produced by Kaity Kline, Nia Dumas and Christopher Thomas. We get engineering support from Stacey Abbott. Our technical director is Carleigh Strange And our Supervising Producer is Michael Lipkin. Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices NPR Privacy Policy
Categories
News Review

Rosneft’s Syzran refinery halted operations due to a drone attack

Categories
News Review

Azerbaijan to supply oil to Armenia: official silence and political-economic implications

Azerbaijan to sell oil to Armenia

Azerbaijan to sell oil to Armenia

Without broad coverage in the Azerbaijani media, Azerbaijan is preparing to sell petroleum products to Armenia — the first step towards economic cooperation between two countries that have been adversaries for decades.

Although official statements claim the issue is still “under discussion”, in reality Baku and Yerevan have already reached an agreement.

As evidence of this, the Azerbaijani government has requested formal permission from Georgia to transit fuel through its territory to Armenia, and even the details of the first shipment have been agreed.

Baku, however, appears keen not to draw domestic attention to this historic development. Public debate has focused mainly on discussions around Georgia’s transit tariff. The article examines the political implications, economic prospects and public reaction to this “secret oil deal.”

The commentary was prepared by a regional analyst. The terms, place names and views expressed reflect only the position of the author or the community they represent, and do not necessarily correspond to the views of JAMnews or its staff.

Political implications and regional context

Although the Azerbaijani authorities are moving ahead with the oil deal, they are in no hurry to announce it publicly. Official statements remain deliberately vague, and local media have given the development almost no coverage.

The government is clearly mindful of long-standing anti-Armenian sentiment. For a society that regained its territories in 2020 and has yet to sign a final peace agreement, selling fuel to a country still widely viewed as an adversary can appear contradictory.

Observers note that there is still no solid political or legal framework for exporting Azerbaijani petroleum products to Armenia, which is why the deal has generated significant public debate.

Even though pro-government media have tried to present the move as a “humanitarian gesture”, critics close to the authorities have raised a pointed question:

If no peace treaty has been signed and Armenia’s constitution still contains territorial claims against Azerbaijan, who can guarantee that, in the event of a renewed conflict, this fuel would not be used against our own military?

Such cautious assessments help explain why Baku is reluctant to give this development too much visibility.

Moment of tension with Tbilisi

This issue has also drawn in a third regional actor — Georgia. The only route through which Azerbaijan can send fuel to Armenia runs across Georgian territory, as direct rail links between Baku and Yerevan have been suspended for nearly 30 years.

According to Minval Politika, a portal close to the Azerbaijani government, Georgia initially proposed an “astronomical tariff” — 92 dollars for 111 kilometres of transit (0.82 dollars per kilometre per tonne). By comparison, Azerbaijan Railways transports the same cargo over 680 kilometres for just 17 dollars, or 0.02 dollars per kilometre. Georgia’s tariff was 40 times higher, a move widely seen as a political signal rather than an economic calculation.

The Georgian government moved quickly to address the frustration coming from Baku. Following a joint appeal from Azerbaijan and Armenia on 5 December, Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze ordered that the first transit of Azerbaijani fuel be carried out free of charge.

Analysts say the episode created a degree of mistrust between Tbilisi and Baku. Georgia is keen to maintain its position as the South Caucasus’ main transit hub and is wary of potential alternative routes that may emerge if Azerbaijan and Armenia move towards reconciliation. Baku, meanwhile, expects Tbilisi — which it has supported for many years — to be mindful of its strategic interests.

What is clear is that the evolving peace process is reshaping the South Caucasus’ political landscape, with all sides now seeking to position themselves in this changing environment.

Yerevan’s position

The Armenian government approaches the issue with caution. Officials avoid directly confirming that Armenia is buying Azerbaijani fuel. The Ministry of Economy instead reports talks with Georgia on transit and says Tbilisi has officially informed Yerevan that it will not apply a tariff to the first shipment. As a result, the focus shifts from Azerbaijan to Georgia’s gesture.

Even so, Armenia effectively acknowledges the arrangement. Economy Minister Gevorg Papoyan said that if the transit goes ahead, the first shipment will be tariff-free and later shipments will be subject to standard transit fees. He welcomed Georgia’s step and described it as a symbolic gesture.

Armenia imported grain through Azerbaijan for the first time in November. Fuel has now appeared on the December agenda. Prime Minister Pashinyan can frame this as an economic opportunity. Yet opposition groups in Armenia view these moves with mixed feelings.

Azerbaijani analysts argue that for a society that has perceived Azerbaijan as an enemy for decades, reliance on Azerbaijani fuel may feel like a blow to national pride.

Pashinyan’s government justifies the move by saying it wants to reduce dependence on Russian energy and lower prices.

More than 60 percent of Armenia’s fuel imports come from Russia. In 2024 this included 230,000 tonnes of petrol and 175,000 tonnes of diesel. Armenia covers the rest of its demand through Iran, Romania, as well as suppliers such as Malta and Turkey.

Buying Azerbaijani petrol and diesel can be seen as an effort to loosen Armenia’s energy dependence on Russia. For Pashinyan, who seeks closer ties with the West, this offers economic and geopolitical benefits.

The ruling Civil Contract party aims to weaken Moscow’s leverage ahead of the parliamentary elections scheduled for June 2026. Energy diversification could reduce Russia’s influence.

If Pashinyan’s team wins the election, Armenia is likely to continue moving away from Russia. The chances of a peace deal with Azerbaijan would also rise. The fuel arrangement between Baku and Yerevan therefore carries political significance that goes far beyond bilateral ties. It has become part of a wider geopolitical game involving Russia, the United States and Georgia.

Economic prospects and benefits

Under the current plan, Azerbaijan will supply a limited amount of fuel to Armenia in a single shipment, likely a trial, first batch.

Although not officially confirmed, it is expected to include petrol and diesel. Experts note that, since Armenia lacks a refinery, the country cannot process crude oil even if it were imported. This means the deal involves refined petroleum products, not crude oil.

Fuel produced by Azerbaijan’s State Oil Company (SOCAR) has long been sold on the Georgian market; now a small portion may be redirected to Armenia. The country’s annual fuel demand is modest — around half a million tonnes — most of which has so far been supplied by Russia. For Azerbaijan, supplying this volume poses no significant burden or economic risk.

The main benefits for Armenia could be lower fuel prices and diversification of supply sources.

Local experts believe that introducing Azerbaijani products into the market could lead to cheaper petrol in Yerevan. Direct rail imports from Georgia reduce logistics costs compared with maritime or road shipments. In November, the delivery of Russian grain via Azerbaijan reportedly cost Armenian bakers less, and a similar effect could apply to fuel.

Full economic cooperation, however, depends on several conditions. There is currently no direct railway link between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Lines that existed previously fell into disuse due to the conflict. If the proposed TRIPP route is implemented, transport between the two countries could become much simpler.

Opening the TRIPP route would effectively establish direct connections between Azerbaijan and Armenia. This would allow Baku to supply fuel and other goods with significantly lower transport costs. For now, however, all shipments must transit through Georgian territory.

Azerbaijan to sell oil to Armenia

The post Azerbaijan to supply oil to Armenia: official silence and political-economic implications first appeared on The South Caucasus News – SouthCaucasusNews.com.

Categories
News Review

Since the beginning of 2025, the Russian army has occupied 0.77% of Ukraine’s territory, or 4,669 square kilometers, according to the Institute for the Study of War.

The post Since the beginning of 2025, the Russian army has occupied 0.77% of Ukraine’s territory, or 4,669 square kilometers, according to the Institute for the Study of War. first appeared on The Russian World – russianworld.net.

Categories
News Review

Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado will miss Nobel Peace Prize ceremony

AP correspondent Charles de Ledesma reports the winner of this year’s Nobel Peace Prize will miss the awards ceremony in Norway.