Guest View: OneTaste’s Real Crime? Living Differently - October Surprise 2016

By Jamie Morgan

OneTaste was run by women a sort of feminine education, teaching people feelings and the feminine. Force was not a part of OneTaste. Attention was the OneTaste syllabus, not force. The women were there to open up their sexuality and find their power.

Nicole Daedone was the founder of OneTaste. Her views on sexuality may be the true, core cause of the prosecution of her and Rachel Cherwitz.

You come, you do some classes, you leave, you hang out with people, you don’t hang out with people. You go to see your family.

OneTaste was an intense experience. It was a place to learn and to push yourself. People had intense experiences.

You opted in, you could do what you want and you could leave whenever you want. Some people had trouble with the intensity of their experiences afterwards, even if they were positive experiences or breakthroughs.

Sometimes they left unhappy and sought vengeance.

Some people found it easier to hate OneTaste and move on with their lives.

Just to be in OneTaste, you had to have a certain level of confidence, because it’s not just sitting at home watching TV. It’s an active lifestyle. People found relationships in OneTaste and dated. Some people got married in OneTaste.

Sometimes in the glow of enthusiasm, the impulse to marry arose. Sometimes it lasted, sometimes it didn’t. But everyone was free to make their own choices — good or foolish, smart or unfortunate. And some, as is the habit of weak humanity, sought to blame it on others.

It was about desire, what does this person want?

What course would fit them? What would serve them?

It was a very open community where everyone was exploring sex and desire. There was a lot of sex. It was sex-positive.

It was strictly over 18. All of the events, all of the courses, all of the games night, community nights. And the houses where people would move in together and practice, were all strictly not for children.

Children were specifically excluded.

Alcohol was excluded. They were all sober events.

If they had sex, they were adults and it was consensual. And anyone could leave at any time.

There was no alcohol at the courses or the events, because that’s a bad thing to add into an already volatile mix. Marijuana was not permitted. No drugs or alcohol.

People would meet up and hang out outside of the official courses and have friendships and people would drink. Probably more weed in California and pints of beer in England.

There were boundaries and care taken to ensure that it was a safe environment. There’s a traffic light system of green, yellow, red on what sort of emotional state you are in, and red means stop.

There were classes about exploring one’s sexuality. Adults who attended such classes would naturally anticipate the possibility that sexuality might be explored. Nicole Daedone infused into the teachings. It was the first lesson. It was the first condition. It was compared to the colors of a traffic light. One needn’t say more than jus the color to express consent or lack thereof “green” meant go forward. “yellow” meant be cautious, slow down. “Red” meant stop. Period. No further word was necessary but the three-letter word red. That was all. That was final! Red meant no consent. Red meant stop. And everybody knew it. And nobody ever, said, that in Nicole Daedone’s classes, anyone man or woman ever uttered the word “red” and it was not honored.

Was there surveillance? Surveilled secretly and surreptitiously by OneTaste as they have been accused in the indictment?

Everyone had private Facebook, private Instagrams, text messages. No one was reading anyone’s phones. There were no CCTV cameras in the houses.

Everyone had their own bedrooms with locks on the door so they could not be interrupted if they were having sex.

The destruction of the community, of what it was Bloomberg article was terrible. Strange allegations and things melded together and taken out of context, twisted.

Above is a rascal named in the Bloomberg article. A cravenly creature, who in his whiney way, cried that he was no longer a man or even a sub-species of a man and Ellen Huet of Bloomberg was quick to pounce on his cowardice and she twisted it into “blame OneTaste.” The craven Hamza Tayeb later walked back his bizarre admission of his coward ness in Bloomberg. but, as befits all cowards everywhere, he walked back his walk back and erased his blog post repudiating Ellen Huet and her distortionist story and vanished into the dark cloud of his own delusions.

People buying each other courses and people sleeping with each other for courses.

There was a woman in London who was dating one of the guys, and she paid for them both to do the relationship course. She paid for him and her to do the course, because they were in a relationship and they wanted to do the relationship course together to improve their relationship. But then you see that framed as like, was he sleeping with her to get her money to do the courses and make money for OneTaste , and it’s all twisted darkly just for views.

The FBI following Bloomberg went looking for five years and they came up with the two women planned to do a crime. Over 12 years. Forced labor conspiracy.

Most people in the One Taste community lived in their own houses.

And then the staff, some of them lived in their own houses, some of them lived together.

And as soon as the events finished at 9 or 10 PM, you just went home, you go to bed, and then you could get up for morning practice. Most of the events were in the evening or at the weekend.

People were running the business, but then there was time to go to the gym or take a nap at home or have sex. People were not run ragged and lacking sleep and gaunt and malnourished.

Most of the houses had food programs where one person would cook and everyone would chip in money and make these big meals.

A lot of people put on weight because the food was good and there was lots of it. They were going to events and having fun, eating out.

The two women – Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz – were the worst conspirators that ever lived. They couldn’t figure out how to do anything right. Everything, all the forced labor they failed at.

Meet the defendants: Rachel Cherwitz and Nicole Daedone. In its inept prosecution of these two women, blundering prosecutors for the Eastern District of New York, embarrassed that their 5 year investigation led to nowhere, came up with a novel charge. Forced labor conspiracy. not forced labor, just the conspiracy to commit forced labor. 12 years in the making, never made. The charge of forced labor conspiracy alone has never been the only charge in an indictment in the history of the untied states. It’s a new one. but when you’re a prosecutor in the Eastern District of New York, you have to save face so you make up a foolish, irrelevant, impossible charge. Later, when you get your ass handed to you, you the prosecutor, will blame it all on Ayries Blanck.

Ayries Blanck is taking the fall. She’s the one who’s going to be arrested, indicted, extradited from Ireland back to the USA. McGinnis will try to escape. Kassner will pretend she just didn’t know. What is her name now? It was Ayries Blanck, then it was Ares Milligan. Last we heard it was Ayreis. They’ll probably call her Cassidy in prison, or maybe Diana, who knows. But she’s headed there shortly. Ayries Blanck go directly to jail, do not pass Dublin, skip Washington DC. You better get a lawyer, your day is coming fast.

Instead it was it seems largely youthful adventures and fun and friendships. They just didn’t know how to conspire right.

The post Guest View: OneTaste’s Real Crime? Living Differently appeared first on Frank Report.

The post Guest View: OneTaste’s Real Crime? Living Differently first appeared on Trump News – trump-news.org.

M	T	W	T	F	S	S
					1	2
3	4	5	6	7	8	9
10	11	12	13	14	15	16
17	18	19	20	21	22	23
24	25	26	27	28	29	30
31