Day: January 12, 2026

🚨 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘁: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗻𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗡𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗞𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗹𝗶𝗻 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗧𝗼𝗼𝗹 🇬🇱❄️

– There is no NATO buildup aimed at the United States.
– There is no political or legal pathway for such a conflict.
– There is a coordinated narrative trying to make you believe otherwise.

There is a growing volume of disinformation across social media claiming the UK and EU have sent ships and troops to Greenland to prepare for conflict with the United States. That framing has no operational logic, no political pathway, and no alliance mechanism that would support it. It exists because it is useful and not functional.

It serves three long-standing Kremlin objectives:

– First, to contest dominance over Greenland and its adjacent Arctic rights.
– Second, to weaken NATO control of the GIUK Gap.
– Third, to fracture alliance cohesion in order to erode support for Ukraine.

The narrative construction is consistent with past Russian influence operations. It targets alliance seams, amplifies sovereignty anxiety, and collapses moral distinction between partners. Greenland sits at the intersection of NATO posture, Arctic security, and European sovereignty. That makes it a natural pressure point. The Kremlin has repeatedly exploited geographic and political fault lines to slow coordination, inject doubt, and erode trust. This case follows the same pattern.

One indicator of coordinated activity is the similarity of content describing an active UK and EU military buildup in preparation for war with the United States. There is no evidence of any force posture shift toward confrontation, no NATO mechanism that would enable it, and no military rationale that would support it. What does exist is narrative value in suggesting it, particularly in an environment already sensitive to questions of US reliability under the current administration and European autonomy.

This line is being pushed because alliance cohesion is vulnerable under stress. Fracturing trust is easier than building it. Seeding suspicion is easier than disproving it. Once doubt enters the bloodstream, facts have to work harder. Once the gap widens, the Kremlin will move to occupy it.

There is a wide gap between administration rhetoric, public opinion, and legal authority in the United States. The president cannot order the military to invade a NATO ally. That authority is constrained by law, treaty obligations, and congressional control. Political language does not translate directly into military action.

The separation of powers in the US Constitution is not a slogan. It is a structural brake that exists to limit federal authority and prevent the concentration of power in the executive. It was designed specifically to prevent the presidency from becoming a monarchy or an autocratic dynastic system.

I understand why many in Europe are uneasy. From the outside, US politics can look unstable. That concern is rational given the stakes it carries both domestically and abroad. What is not rational is allowing that anxiety to be weaponized by a hostile power.

I would never question the United Kingdom’s ability to self-correct. I would never assume France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, or the Nordic states were one election away from collapse. These are legacy democracies with institutional depth and corrective capacity. The same standard should apply here.

The free West needs to work with those inside the United States who understand what is at stake and are actively resisting the erosion of democratic norms. Writing off the country as hostile or rhetorically aligning it with Russia is not only inaccurate, it is strategically corrosive. It collapses critical distinctions, blurs the line between ally and adversary, and accelerates the very divide Moscow is trying to engineer. The United States is not the Kremlin. Its people are not Russian proxies. Its institutions, for all their stress and noise, are not instruments of Moscow. Treating them as such does not apply pressure. It surrenders narrative ground to a hostile power and legitimizes the fracture it is trying to manufacture.

Also, generalizing all Americans as enemies simplifies a complex political landscape into a caricature and converts internal disagreement into external rupture. It results in a narrowing of the space for cooperation, hardens positions on all sides, and makes alliance repair more difficult precisely when cohesion matters most.

Just as the United States came to the defense of Europe and Asia when they were threatened by fascism and imperialism, I am asking Europe and the rest of the free world not to turn away now. Abandoning America in this moment will not stabilize the alliance or protect European autonomy. It will deepen political division, weaken strategic coherence, and hand leverage to actors who benefit from Western disunity.

We are family, not enemies.

The United States is a nation of inherited ties, cultures, and religious beliefs drawn from all corners of the world. It is one of the most diverse and integrated societies on earth. Its people come from Europe, Latin America, Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. That history does not vanish when politics get loud. It endures, and it binds us in the same way it binds Europe and the rest of the free world.

We are family.

Follow OSINT Intuit™ for disciplined, evidence-based analysis of modern geopolitical conflict.

— OSINT Intuit™ (@UKikaski) Jan 12, 2026

Nearly 15,000 nurses across New York City walked out on the job Monday after their union and employers failed to agree on a new contract. Hospitals argued the union’s demands, which include increased pay and full health care benefits, were too costly.

tinyurl.com/zzk7u8ms

— NewsNation (@NewsNation) Jan 12, 2026