Day: May 6, 2025
Missile arrival in Pakistan… It appears there was a previous arrival as the crowd had their phones out to film it.#OSINT pic.twitter.com/NyWRnnCPX5
— OSINT Intuit 🇺🇸 🇨🇦 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 🇮🇱 🇬🇪 (@UKikaski) May 6, 2025
The post Supreme Court allows reinstatement of Trump ban on transgender troops first appeared on Capitol Riot – capitol-riot.com.
One fan claims they have 100 million reasons to be upset over Shedeur Sanders’ stunning free fall in last month’s NFL draft.
A Sanders supporter identified as John Doe is suing the league for $100 million due to the “emotional distress and trauma suffered as a result of the NFL’s collusive practices and the harmful statements made regarding” the ex-Colorado quarterback, who shockingly slid to the Browns at No. 144 in the fifth round, according to court documents viewed by The Post.
In the court filing submitted last week, the plaintiff — described as a “dedicated fan of Colorado football and has closely followed Shedeur Sanders throughout the 2023 and 2024 seasons” — alleges “reports and leaked statements suggested that Sanders ‘tanked interviews,’ ‘wasn’t prepared,’ and ‘was too cocky,’ which contributed to a narrative that has unjustly harmed his reputation and potential as a player.”
Doe claims “these slanderous statements reflect biases that influenced the NFL’s decision-making process,” which in turn have caused “emotional distress and trauma to the Plaintiff as a fan and consumer.”
The plaintiff believes the NFL is in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, alleging “collusion among NFL teams to influence the drafting process and the subsequent low selection of Shedeur Sanders constitutes a conspiracy to restrain trade and limit competition within the league.”
Additionally, the lawsuit states the league violated the Civil Rights Act by claiming “the decisions made regarding Sanders may have been influenced by racial discrimination, violating his rights as a player.”
Beyond the nine-figure sum in “punitive damages,” Doe seeks “a formal acknowledgment from the NFL regarding the emotional distress caused by their actions and statements,” “a retraction of the slanderous statements made about Shedeur Sanders, along with an apology for any harm caused to his reputation,” as well as an “implementation of fairer practices in the drafting process to ensure that talented players are recognized and given opportunities based on merit.”
A league spokesperson did not respond to The Independent’s request for comment.
Sanders, the son of Hall of Famer Deion Sanders, was considered the most polarizing prospect of the 2025 class.
The former Buffaloes star was said to have rubbed some teams the wrong way at the NFL Scouting Combine in February, with an NBC Sports report alleging he “came off as unprofessional and disinterested.”
As the draft approached, analysts and experts struggled to pinpoint where Sanders would land with the quarterback-needy Giants, Saints and Steelers identified as possible destinations.
All those clubs passed on Sanders and instead drafted quarterbacks Jaxson Dart (Giants, No. 25), Tyler Shough (Saints, No. 40) and Will Howard (Steelers, No. 185).
Sanders, who was drafted by the Browns after they selected former Oregon QB Dillon Gabriel at No. 94, told reporters in late April he’s “ready to work.”
“The opportunity to see the real me and not stuff that might not be true,” Sanders said.
He and Gabriel join a crowded Browns QB room that includes veterans Joe Flacco and Kenny Pickett.
The post Shedeur Sanders fan suing NFL for $100 million over ‘emotional distress’ of QB’s draft fall first appeared on Capitol Riot – capitol-riot.com.
The post Report finds big drop in FBI’s use of intelligence database to search for information on Americans first appeared on Links – The News And Times – links-newsandtimes.com.
Mangione defense fund tops $1M
The post Mangione defense fund tops $1M – The Hill first appeared on The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com.

Albert Park, Chief Economist at the Asian Development Bank (ADB), told InterpressNews that Georgia initially benefited from the Russia–Ukraine war and the sanctions imposed on Russia, as it became a preferred transit route for cargo bypassing Russia. However, he now sees growing uncertainty.
Specifically, Park points to three major geopolitical uncertainties:
- the possible lifting of sanctions on Russia;
- the establishment of peace in Ukraine;
- changes in the current policy of the Donald Trump administration.
According to the economist, if these developments materialise, Georgia could lose part of the business it attracted after the war in Ukraine began — and this could have a notable impact on the country’s economy.
Albert Park:
“I think we need to focus on making Georgia as efficient as possible along the Middle Corridor trade route by reducing transaction costs and eliminating any existing delays.
Economists see it this way: when people get used to a route that is more cost-effective, they don’t want to return to the old system. So Georgia can retain this business — but only if it remains competitive in service provision. At this stage, the priority should be maintaining service efficiency until sanctions are lifted.
I believe Georgia will be able to retain some of this business, though not all of it — that will depend on how effectively you can provide services.”
sanctions against Russia
The post Asian Development Bank economist: “Georgia benefited from sanctions against Russia — but not for long” first appeared on The South Caucasus News – SouthCaucasusNews.com.





